Vai al contenuto

Lingua interfaccia: IT. Contenuti editoriali: inglese. Prezzi riferiti a Regno Unito.

Sir CompareConfronti con le proveChiedi a Sir CompareChiediTelegram
Regno Unito · GBP

Notizia

Prix Goncourt winner Philippe Jaenada admits using AI in his novel

Aggiornato

Foto illustrativa: AI Tools & SaaS: Code on computer monitor (Unsplash)
Foto illustrativa

What Jaenada said on French radio

Philippe Jaenada won the Prix Goncourt on Tuesday for L’Inconnue du quai de Javel. The next day he told France Inter radio that he had turned to AI three times while writing the novel.

The first use, he said, was to slip a ChatGPT-written sentence into the book to play with the reader. He said he told the Goncourt jurors which sentence it was only on the day of the award. He also put in a section of AI-generated text to poke fun at ChatGPT, which he said gave absurd answers about a technical detail, and used it for research.

The book the prize removed from its longlist

The admission came a day after Jaenada collected the award. In September, the Académie Goncourt had removed Thélyson Orélien’s C’était ça ou Mourir from its longlist.

The Canadian-Haitian writer’s debut had sold more than 35,000 copies and won the Prix du roman Fnac. Journalist Samuel Fitoussi ran it through the AI-detection tool Pangram and concluded much of it was machine-generated. The accuracy of AI-detection software has been called into question.

In a 25 September statement, the academy said analyses showed the novel was in all likelihood very largely the product of an artificial intelligence. It said it wanted to protect the integrity of a prize honouring literature written by women and men.

Orélien denied it, then his publisher ended the relationship

In an October statement, Orélien called the allegations slander and heresy and said not a single sentence in the book was created by a machine. In the same statement he admitted plagiarism in earlier work and apologised for claiming as his own texts that were not his.

A week later, his Canadian publisher Boréal announced that fresh evidence contradicted the author’s repeated assurances and indicated that AI had played a part in producing the text. The company then severed its ties with him.

Jaenada had defended AI before the award

Jaenada had spoken about AI before winning. In an interview with 20 Minutes, he asked whether a film director would hide using special effects. He predicted it would soon be impossible to say a text was 100% human-written.

He also insisted AI will never be able to write a book with its heart, its soul, its memories. On France Inter he said AI cannot be held back and cannot be pretended away. He said it has to be used, but first acknowledged, and above all tamed, so that it is useful.

The double-standard accusations online

The contrast between the two cases prompted some accusations of a racial double standard online. One user on X wrote: "So when it’s an old white man it’s fine, but when it’s a young writer of colour he gets stoned in the public square?"

Another said Jaenada had faced no media lynching and no banishment over his use of AI, a leniency denied to Thélyson Orélien.

Related coverage

Source: The Guardian · AI (UK)

Hardware per provare l'AI in locale

Link affiliati: possiamo ricevere una commissione sugli acquisti idonei, e non cambia i nostri dati né le classifiche. Aprono i risultati di ricerca di Amazon: prezzi e disponibilità si vedono lì.

Video

Cosa è cambiato

  • Pagina aggiornata

Come metto in fila i prodotti

La posta di Sir Compare

Novità su Strumenti AI e SaaS? Te le scrivo io.

Scegli cosa ti interessa: ti scrivo solo quando esce qualcosa di nuovo — una guida, una notizia, un prezzo verificato che scende.

Passo 1 di 2

Cosa ti interessa?

Scegline quante vuoi. Se non scegli niente, ricevi le novità di tutte le sezioni.

Cosa vuoi ricevere
  • Solo quello che scegli
  • Mai email vuote
  • Esci con un clic

Il tuo assistente

Apri la pagina completa →