Comparison · AI Models & LLMs
Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5
The same method as our rankings: scores from the engine, sourced data, verified prices.
Details: Claude Fable 5.1 →Details: GLM-5 →

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic
Full sheet →- Context window
- 1M tokens
- Maximum output
- 128k tokens
- Input cost per 1M tokens
- $10.00
- Output cost per 1M tokens
- $50.00
GLM-5
Z.ai
Full sheet →71.3/100
- SWE-bench accuracy
- 72.8%
- Context window
- 200k tokens
- Maximum output
- 128k tokens
- Input cost per 1M tokens
- $1.00
The numbers side by side
Each bar is the product's verified figure; on every row the longer bar is the higher of the two values.
- Context windowhigher is better
- Maximum outputhigher is better
- Input cost per 1M tokenslower is better
- Cached input cost per 1M tokenslower is better
- Output cost per 1M tokenslower is better
Who wins where
- For long documentsClaude Fable 5.1Context window
- Cheaper to readGLM-5Input cost per 1M tokens
- Cheaper to writeGLM-5Output cost per 1M tokens
Claude Fable 5.1: reads images · Claude Fable 5.1: calls tools and functions · GLM-5: open weights (downloadable)
Data sheet side by side
Performance
Memory and answer length
API prices
Knowledge and abilities
Size and openness
What a month costs
Change the volumes: the cost is worked out from the verified list prices above.
The scenarios are only starting points to edit, not data about your use. List prices without discounts, time-of-day rates or taxes.
Questions and answers
For long documents: Claude Fable 5.1 or GLM-5?
Claude Fable 5.1: 1M tokens against 200k tokens (Context window).
Cheaper to read: Claude Fable 5.1 or GLM-5?
GLM-5: $1.00 against $10.00 (Input cost per 1M tokens).
Cheaper to write: Claude Fable 5.1 or GLM-5?
GLM-5: $3.20 against $50.00 (Output cost per 1M tokens).
